This work highlights the normative dimensions of “ecological forestry,” a strategy of forest management that uses silviculture to mimic the effects
of non-anthropogenic processes of disturbance and succession in order to meet multiple objectives on a single piece of land. An analysis of the arguments made about ecological forestry, both broadly theoretical and pertaining specifically to western Oregon, shows that empirical uncertainties and normative gaps need to be addressed before we can make a clear, well-reasoned decision about whether ecological forestry is a viable and appropriate strategy for forest management and conservation.
Chelsea Batavia, Michael P. Nelson
