Table 4. Comparison of the December 1964 and February 1996 peak streamflows for the HJA gauged watersheds. When instrument malfunctions have occurred, peaks have historically been estimated using past relationships with peak flows from other similar watersheds.

Gaging	|---------------Peak Flow----------------|		Return
Station	Year	Day	Time	Cfs	Cfsm		Rank	Interval¹	Comments

WS 1	1964	22 Dec	0500	61.2	165.2		2	22
	1996	 7 Feb	0320	84.3	227.6		1	44

WS 2	1964	22 Dec	0950	35.0	150.4		2	22
	1996	 7 Feb	0950	46.0	197.4      	1	44		Peak from PG3 recorder

WS 3	1964	22 Dec	0900	66.4	169.8  est.	1	44		Debris slide, record estimated
	1996	 7 Feb	0330	56.5	144.6  est.	2	22		Debris slide, record estimated

WS 6	1964	22 Dec	1230	10.1	201.6  est.	1	34		Malfunction, record estimated
	1996	 7 Feb	0440	10.0	200.4  est.	2	17		Debris filled flume, peak estimated

WS 7	1964	22 Dec	1400	11.7	197.7  est.	1	34		Malfunction, record estimated
	1996	 7 Feb	1025	10.1	170.2		2	17

WS 8	1964	22 Dec	1400	14.3	173.0  est.	1	34		Malfunction, record estimated
	1996	 7 Feb	1135	13.9	168.4		2	17

WS 9	1964	------	----	----	-----   	-	---		Gaging Station not established
	1996	 7 Feb	1030     4.7	142.0		1	26

WS 10	1964	------	----	-----	-----   	-	---		Gaging Station not established
	1996	 7 Feb	1130	 8.7	221.6  est.	1	26		Debris slide, peak estimated

Mack Cr	1964	------	----	-----	-----   	-	---		Gaging Station not established
	1996	 7 Feb	1035	330.2	147.2  		1	18		

Lookout	1964	22 Dec	1100	6660.	 279.		2	---
	1996	 7 Feb	1100	8000. 	 332.  est.	1	---		USGS estimate                   


¹ Weibull plotting position (m/n+1) used, where m = event rank 
(ie., 1=largest) and n = number of events.  Note that the estimated 
return interval for the 7 Feb storm is constrained by the period of 
record, which varies from 18 years at Mack Creek to 44 years at WS 2.